![on1 photo raw 2017.5 on1 photo raw 2017.5](https://on1-wp.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/announcing-on1-photo-raw-2018-5-960x540.jpg)
Unfortunately, that efficiency does get lost once I have to start making a lot of custom edits. Where it lacks a bit in workflow, it makes up in the efficiency of not spending a ton of time clicking through edits. However, my favorite aspect is that the default processing in DxO gets me 95% of the way to a final image, especially with regards to exposure. In some ways it has too much flexibility. It's interface isn't the best at being intuitive, although I've learned a lot of it. Bridge doesn't really suffice as a replacement either.ĭxO has been fairly quick except perhaps exporting. But I have no desire to use Photoshop (and ACR stand-alone) as the workflow features just aren't there. I always find it a bit disappointing that Photoshop operates better on my computer than LR does. My only real complaint is that it seem to efficiently use my system. I did like its develop module, especially in terms of ease of use and workflow. I personally never felt LR was great at its cataloging.
![on1 photo raw 2017.5 on1 photo raw 2017.5](https://www.lightandmatter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/On1-workspace-2.jpg)
Of course, edits aren't able to be used across software, which is fine.Īnyway, I digressed, but the point is that I like having things separate because I can focus on the one primary function of a software.
#On1 photo raw 2017.5 software
However, if I change defaults to store edits in the metadata or separate files, my DAM file will manage those files too, and I'll always be able to access edits in whatever software I choose. I've not used Capture One enough recently, but I believe with its catalog it does this too. Storing in a catalog is a bit of a way to tie users into your software. Most processing software store their edits in either a catalog, metadata, or separate side-car file. I stuck with my stand-alone DAM (IMatch).Īll I really want out of my Catalog is the ability to categorize and find files for processing. While I used their Catalog out of requirement, I did not use it as my means of cataloging files. Learning to develop RAW, I used RawTherapee, Silkypix, and Lightroom, ultimately settling on LR for some years (LR3 to LR6). When I finally got one, I didn't want to have to commit to any software across the board. Part of it was because I was cataloging before there was a LR and before I had a dSLR. I actually like to keep my cataloging separate. In terms of Cataloging, I get that LR is advantageous for some. I shifted over to DxO a couple of years ago, and have used it almost exclusively.
#On1 photo raw 2017.5 update
I did use LR (have a stand-alone LR6 license), but with my decent computer, each update just made it drag more and more. Most software do similar things albeit the way of getting there will vary.